The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited

In 1985 SQW’s Cambridge Phenomenon book charted the emergence of a group of some 350 high-tech firms in and around the university city of Cambridge. It traced the origins of many firms, through both direct and indirect routes, back to the University and the local research community. The originators and factors driving growth were analysed and the vital roles played by a small number of key individuals were described.

SQW has recently returned to explore how the Cambridge hi-tech cluster has changed since 1985. The resulting findings have been published in a new book Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited.

A Dynamic Cluster

Over the past fifteen years the growth being seen in the mid-1980s has been sustained and, in a number of ways, strengthened:

Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited

The Cambridge high-tech cluster has seen many exciting changes over the last 15 years. Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited tracks these in two parts.

Part One provides an analytical overview. It outlines the changes that have occurred over the past fifteen years in headline terms – where the 20,000 new high-tech jobs are located and in what kind of firms. Changes in the University and related research institutes are then illustrated within the context of major changes in the UK higher education system. Firms are then considered in four separate chapters dealing with:

The final two chapters of Part One explore what may be identified as the ingredients of the area’s success – considered from the perspective of a business cluster – and then what needs to be done to ensure that success is sustained into the future.

Part Two looks in greater depth at a number of particularly interesting aspects of the Cambridge high-tech cluster.

Detailed analyses are made of two contrasting sectors: biotechnology and instrumentation. The former has emerged as one of the new strengths of the area and exhibits many of the attributes of a competitive cluster. Instrumentation, by contrast, was one of the earliest foundations of high-tech business in Cambridge, but has gone through a difficult period and over the past fifteen years has recorded the weakest sectoral performance.

Two further chapters probe aspects of the area’s business dynamic. First, there is a comparative analysis of entrepreneurship as measured by attitudes of University students. Second, the start-up phenomenon is explored through an econometric analysis that seeks to unravel what factors can be said to cause success in new-start firms.

There are then three chapters that consider the vital framework factors for the development of the high-tech cluster: